Information gathering and assessment can be biased if a clinician?

Information gathering and assessment can indeed be biased when a clinician uses very general questions, open-ended leading questions, or professional jargon. Each of these methods has the potential to influence the responses from clients, thus compromising the accuracy and validity of the assessment.

Using very general questions can lead to vague responses that do not provide the detailed information needed for a comprehensive assessment. This lack of specificity can result in a failure to capture important nuances regarding a client's situation.

Open-ended leading questions can subtly guide clients towards certain responses rather than allowing them to express their thoughts freely. This can skew the data collected, as clients may feel pressured to align their answers with the implied expectations of the clinician.

Professional jargon can create barriers to effective communication, especially if clients do not understand the terminology used. This misunderstanding may result in clients not fully expressing their thoughts or experiences, thereby limiting the depth of the information provided.

Thus, the correct answer highlights that all these factors can contribute to biases in information gathering and assessment, emphasizing the importance of using clear, neutral language and targeted questioning techniques to achieve accurate assessments.